<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RED YOU R DEAD Masher-Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/</link>
	<description>Bike Your Drive!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginjar</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-23182</link>
		<dc:creator>ginjar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 16:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-23182</guid>
		<description>oh yeh and when i tried to change the crappy stock peddles i discovered RYD had managed to cross thread the peddles in!! apart from being amazed at this feat i was boned. replaced cranks, pedals and repacked my bb cup threads with nylon tape and i was back on the road</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeh and when i tried to change the crappy stock peddles i discovered RYD had managed to cross thread the peddles in!! apart from being amazed at this feat i was boned. replaced cranks, pedals and repacked my bb cup threads with nylon tape and i was back on the road</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginjar</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-23181</link>
		<dc:creator>ginjar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 16:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-23181</guid>
		<description>NO WAY. bought this whip when i was in la and needed a ride asap, after about a week got some creakin noises so i pulled out the bb and found the whole shell was oval shaped!!... threads were all good, no wear showing - just total junk. sent RYD an email (as i was in SF by this stage) and never got a reply. also the geo is horrific NOT TRICK. its cheap, but you still dont get what you payed for. ginjar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO WAY. bought this whip when i was in la and needed a ride asap, after about a week got some creakin noises so i pulled out the bb and found the whole shell was oval shaped!!&#8230; threads were all good, no wear showing &#8211; just total junk. sent RYD an email (as i was in SF by this stage) and never got a reply. also the geo is horrific NOT TRICK. its cheap, but you still dont get what you payed for. ginjar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RL</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-23108</link>
		<dc:creator>RL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 03:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-23108</guid>
		<description>I like 30 seconds to Mars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like 30 seconds to Mars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-23106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-23106</guid>
		<description>@Raiyn...even &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is a stretch...another disposable TV drama.  

Gotta say, though, that I saw 30 Seconds to Mars live at Jannus Landing in St. Pete a few years ago...at the time, I had no idea that the heavily-mascaraed frontman was Jared Leto (they opened for another band that we were there to see), but they were pretty OK.  Afterwards, when we found out it was him, I was actually more impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Raiyn&#8230;even <em>that</em> is a stretch&#8230;another disposable TV drama.  </p>
<p>Gotta say, though, that I saw 30 Seconds to Mars live at Jannus Landing in St. Pete a few years ago&#8230;at the time, I had no idea that the heavily-mascaraed frontman was Jared Leto (they opened for another band that we were there to see), but they were pretty OK.  Afterwards, when we found out it was him, I was actually more impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raiyn</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-23105</link>
		<dc:creator>Raiyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 07:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-23105</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Poseurs....... the last thing Jared Leto did that was worth paying any attention to was &quot;My So-Called Life&quot; back in the mid 90&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Poseurs&#8230;&#8230;. the last thing Jared Leto did that was worth paying any attention to was &#8220;My So-Called Life&#8221; back in the mid 90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lote Leto</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-23103</link>
		<dc:creator>Lote Leto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 18:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-23103</guid>
		<description>Somebody know what king of bike Jared have in that kings and queens video? Model or something? Please help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody know what king of bike Jared have in that kings and queens video? Model or something? Please help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron b</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-20247</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-20247</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing reading some of these comments. I know exactly what the reviewer means when talking about the &quot;rear end trying to catch up&quot; during a sprint. Maybe the difference is that some of the commenters don&#039;t have much or any experience on a fixed gear bike, be it an actual track bike or a conversion.

I commute on 2 different bikes. One is a trek 520, and one is a &quot;track bike.&quot; It&#039;s an IRO Mark V, so you might consider that a road bike with track dropouts, but it&#039;s pretty close to track geometry. My commute is 7 miles one way. This is a completely reasonable distance on fixie. The bike is probably half the weight of my 520, which I really only ride if it&#039;s raining, or if I feel lazy and want to coast.

I do agree that this bike is a bit expensive for the generic parts, but they&#039;re selling an image, and not a particularly good on in my opinion. The fact is there are people out there who would gladly pay $599 for this bike, regardless of spelling errors or whatever other flaws you perceive. The only reason I wouldn&#039;t consider it a commuter is because it seems more like a trick bike, with the flat bars and the 650 front wheel. Nobody sets up a track bike like that unless they&#039;re trying to do bar spins and the like.

Having said all that, it&#039;s good to see a fixed gear bike reviewed as a commuter, even if it&#039;s one that&#039;s not really setup as such. Because when it comes down to it, a bike is a bike. If it gets you from point A to point B it&#039;s serving its purpose. To each his/her own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing reading some of these comments. I know exactly what the reviewer means when talking about the &#8220;rear end trying to catch up&#8221; during a sprint. Maybe the difference is that some of the commenters don&#8217;t have much or any experience on a fixed gear bike, be it an actual track bike or a conversion.</p>
<p>I commute on 2 different bikes. One is a trek 520, and one is a &#8220;track bike.&#8221; It&#8217;s an IRO Mark V, so you might consider that a road bike with track dropouts, but it&#8217;s pretty close to track geometry. My commute is 7 miles one way. This is a completely reasonable distance on fixie. The bike is probably half the weight of my 520, which I really only ride if it&#8217;s raining, or if I feel lazy and want to coast.</p>
<p>I do agree that this bike is a bit expensive for the generic parts, but they&#8217;re selling an image, and not a particularly good on in my opinion. The fact is there are people out there who would gladly pay $599 for this bike, regardless of spelling errors or whatever other flaws you perceive. The only reason I wouldn&#8217;t consider it a commuter is because it seems more like a trick bike, with the flat bars and the 650 front wheel. Nobody sets up a track bike like that unless they&#8217;re trying to do bar spins and the like.</p>
<p>Having said all that, it&#8217;s good to see a fixed gear bike reviewed as a commuter, even if it&#8217;s one that&#8217;s not really setup as such. Because when it comes down to it, a bike is a bike. If it gets you from point A to point B it&#8217;s serving its purpose. To each his/her own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-20221</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-20221</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think it&#039;s a poseuriffic toy. I kind of respect fixie hipsters who built their own bikes from old frames. It&#039;s a green choice, and shows some style and artistic ability. This bike has no cred. 

I also understand that the name is Red You R Dead----but why not fix it on the head tube? People are going to riding around with a glaring grammatical error on their bikes. My opinion? The bike makers didn&#039;t realize their mistake until way after production started and the &quot;Red You R Dead&quot; is a way to cover. I think they, like many people, don&#039;t know the difference between &quot;you&#039;re&quot; and &quot;your&quot;. 

At least it has a steel frame. You would get laughed at by any messengers in NYC while riding it, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think it&#8217;s a poseuriffic toy. I kind of respect fixie hipsters who built their own bikes from old frames. It&#8217;s a green choice, and shows some style and artistic ability. This bike has no cred. </p>
<p>I also understand that the name is Red You R Dead&#8212;-but why not fix it on the head tube? People are going to riding around with a glaring grammatical error on their bikes. My opinion? The bike makers didn&#8217;t realize their mistake until way after production started and the &#8220;Red You R Dead&#8221; is a way to cover. I think they, like many people, don&#8217;t know the difference between &#8220;you&#8217;re&#8221; and &#8220;your&#8221;. </p>
<p>At least it has a steel frame. You would get laughed at by any messengers in NYC while riding it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RL Policar</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-20203</link>
		<dc:creator>RL Policar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-20203</guid>
		<description>Jon,

Dodge your comment about the brakes? This is what you said, &quot;No brakes (illegal in most states, of course)? Check.&quot; That wasn&#039;t even posed as a question.

So to answer your &quot;question&quot;, NO it does not have brakes. 

Thanks for providing the CVC.  But I was unclear on your non-factual sentiments-&quot;(Oddly, section b bans ape-hanger bars, and section c forbids tallbikes… clearly, California has its priorities straight!)&quot; What does that even mean?

Again, you did not read the review completely, if you&#039;re going to quote me, get it straight. 

&quot;One of the things I’ve noticed with bikes is that aluminum frames tend to have a snappier feel when sprinting, but with steel, I can feel the rear end trying to catch up with the rest of the bike. But with the Masher I get that same snappy feel as aluminum.&quot;

If you didn&#039;t know, steel bikes tend to have a flex feel when you&#039;re sprinting. Though the Masher is 4130 chromo, it felt like I was riding an alum bike when I would sprint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>Dodge your comment about the brakes? This is what you said, &#8220;No brakes (illegal in most states, of course)? Check.&#8221; That wasn&#8217;t even posed as a question.</p>
<p>So to answer your &#8220;question&#8221;, NO it does not have brakes. </p>
<p>Thanks for providing the CVC.  But I was unclear on your non-factual sentiments-&#8221;(Oddly, section b bans ape-hanger bars, and section c forbids tallbikes… clearly, California has its priorities straight!)&#8221; What does that even mean?</p>
<p>Again, you did not read the review completely, if you&#8217;re going to quote me, get it straight. </p>
<p>&#8220;One of the things I’ve noticed with bikes is that aluminum frames tend to have a snappier feel when sprinting, but with steel, I can feel the rear end trying to catch up with the rest of the bike. But with the Masher I get that same snappy feel as aluminum.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you didn&#8217;t know, steel bikes tend to have a flex feel when you&#8217;re sprinting. Though the Masher is 4130 chromo, it felt like I was riding an alum bike when I would sprint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecommuters.com/2009/11/30/red-you-r-dead-masher-review/#comment-20202</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecommuters.com/?p=3008#comment-20202</guid>
		<description>I sure look for baffling non-factual sentiments like &quot;I can feel the rear end trying to catch up with the rest of the bike&quot; when I read a technical review. What does that even mean?

I also notice you dodged my brake comments. Since I assume you&#039;re in California, I&#039;ll point you to California Vehicular Code,  Division 11, Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 21201, subpart a: &quot;No person shall operate a bicycle on a roadway unless it is equipped with a brake which will enable the operator to make one braked wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement. &quot; A fixed hub is not a braking device, period, even if it accomplishes the &quot;dry skid&quot; result. (Oddly, section b bans ape-hanger bars, and section c forbids tallbikes... clearly, California has its priorities straight!)

For the record, 650c was, before it was stolen by triatheletes and turned all frenchy in this country, 26x1&quot; (not 26x1.00), among other 26xfraction variants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure look for baffling non-factual sentiments like &#8220;I can feel the rear end trying to catch up with the rest of the bike&#8221; when I read a technical review. What does that even mean?</p>
<p>I also notice you dodged my brake comments. Since I assume you&#8217;re in California, I&#8217;ll point you to California Vehicular Code,  Division 11, Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 21201, subpart a: &#8220;No person shall operate a bicycle on a roadway unless it is equipped with a brake which will enable the operator to make one braked wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement. &#8221; A fixed hub is not a braking device, period, even if it accomplishes the &#8220;dry skid&#8221; result. (Oddly, section b bans ape-hanger bars, and section c forbids tallbikes&#8230; clearly, California has its priorities straight!)</p>
<p>For the record, 650c was, before it was stolen by triatheletes and turned all frenchy in this country, 26&#215;1&#8243; (not 26&#215;1.00), among other 26xfraction variants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

